
If like me you have read
The China Study and found it distressingly and vastly at odds with anything like Traditional Foodist ideas such as those perpetuated by Weston Price et al, then you might be interested to read
this, whereby
Dr. Campbell author of
The China Study in lieu of an onslaught of criticism remarks that his study was only ever observational and correlational. That it was unfortunate that animal
fats were villainised, that he has had evidence since to the contrary: that plant oils and fats contribute more to the growing of tumors than animal fats. His mistake was in lumping animal fats and all other animal products and proteins into the same category and in never actually carrying out proper trials to test his theories (if you have not read it, his book claims that meat and dairy cause cancer. He looked at those who ate very little of either and measured their health against those who ate a lot.)
Here is another link that debates The China Study. It's really great actually, I just re-read it when I checked the link worked. Very thorough and points to the same thing; that The China Study is an observational study that uses correlation to equal causation which is profoundly untrue. I was surprised to find his work
refuted so thoroughly, I now feel like selling my superflous copy just to be rid of it from my overburdened kitchen library (which could do with a sorting and culling in any case unless I am planning the purchase of yet more bookshelves). The unfortunately named
Denise Minger (of the last link) also has a great little section on teeth and raw foods and phosphorus/calcium intake (plus the pretty weird and scary bit about after one year as a raw foodist she had 14 cavities, her entire life to that point had amounted to only 1), so her site is worth a browse if only to debunk the current trends (or myths) of the all raw vegan having a 'better' diet.
I found an interesting blog
here with the title:
Nutrition and Physical Regeneration, which yeah, made me smile. For a minute. If I were another jollier sort of person no doubt I would have laughed, ho ho ho, what fun! Alas though, I was just straight into reading as usual. His recent post talks about group of individuals (such as the Massi) who survive (and do so with extraordinary good health) on animal milks, blood and meat alone - that they have been a
'thorn in the side of the lipid hypothesis' for a long time. The
lipid hypothesis is very interesting, mostly I think in the way that vegetable oil producers clamped down on it and have held it aloft as their trophy of good health ever since. It has mostly been refuted and is an outmoded way of viewing fats but still you have
Benecol types of non foods stuff on the shelves and selling like (non fat I presume) hot-cakes. It's also weird, think ye not, that it is held as
gospel by most dr's yet it is still only a
hypothesis. Kinda remarkable in a freaky way. There is not actually much science out there to back up the notion that animal fat and cholesterol cause heart disease. Back in the day of being new to it I read an article called
The Oiling of America (perhaps it was by Sally Fallon? I can't remember although I will try and reference it in a minute). Ok,
here. It was fascinating. In short: Vegetable oils were once only used in paint. Humans in the US ate massive quantities of tallow, lard and butter as their main sources of fat. Some famous Dr. guy (I am sure he really did have a name)was once quoted as telling a junior not to bother getting interested in coronary heart disease, it was so
rare he'd never make a living from studying it or practicing in that area. Then petroleum became much cheaper to source and replaced vegetable oils in paint. Veg oil farmers were left scratching their heads and wondering how to market their wares and to whom. They decided to use it in animal feed, mostly for cattle. After a few years though cattle farmers were distressed and unhappy at the tumors, illness and strange growths and sickness in their animals and pulled veg oils out of their feeds. Enter the Lipid Hypothesis and straight off the veg oil farmers rubbed their hands with glee and started marketing their oils towards human consumption. And that's it. Here is where we stand, noshing back the poisonous gloop in every premade food.

My main fat is coconut oil. Virgin and cold pressed and organic but still, it's coconut oil. From the other side of the planet, and despite it pure saturated fat form (MCT's), I realise it's still a
tropical nut oil and defeats my living and eating local ideal. We get through a massive 1kg every two weeks. I think I need to still use this (gotta love the massive amounts of lauric acid) but favour more local and animal based fats. Keeping the ratio in the latter's favour. It feels kinda scary and a big leap, but I am going to try. I started this last week by adding some unpasteurised goat milk cheese each day. I am not sure if I feel more inflamed, I have achy ribs and the same level of general overall up and downness, maybe a bit more mucous? Not sure, I plan on giving it three weeks and then evaluating.
These are the cheeses. Lucky for me they are produced about five minutes away but I see they sell them all over the country. They do, I admit taste so so good. I forgot how wonderful goat cheese is :) I made ghee last night. Ideally I think raw butter would be best but I couldn't get any so I used just plain organic. I used
this method. Very lovely clear golden oil. Will I dare try it? It's so so hard to reintroduce things. It's like I have terrible (unfounded tho I suppose) fear that one teaspoon of a supposed offending item might make me terribly ill. On the bright side it might just curb my hunger and be a good source of fat for the day.

The other biggie for me. I have a craving every day for something sweet. I just can't get away from it. When I omit the little bits of sweetness from my diet I am a horrible horrible person, I wouldn't like to be around me. I have one little bitty bite of my homemade chocolate and I am sane and happy and even keeled again. I see just typing that that I prolly have a major big deal happening there. Which I tend to overlook. For months it's been at the back of my mind, that the high fructose in the agave and the xylitol might be contributing to the inflammation I experience. That fructose causes increased insulin and leptin receptor sensitivity; glycating sugar activates the immune system in a defensive manner.....I keep reading little bits here and there and it confirms it. But I just have not really wanted to *know*. I turn the cheek because I have already cut SO MUCH out from my diet, it would be the last straw it's always felt. But, what if I could cut this out of my diet and be well? What if it *is* the fructose causing or at least perpetuating levels of inflammation? My bloods look good, I have no raised ESR or CRP any longer. But still some days I don't feel well. My acupuncture helps I am sure of it. And the pulse diagnosis alongside confirms less 'heat' in my blood. The Chinese herbs I take also work to rid the body of heat. I am an addict as sure as the day is long. And when I wake up I straight off want a bite of something sweet) after all it's been a good ole stretch there of being asleep and all without food.

I get weekly emails from a few health websites, one of them is mercola.com. More and more and more the content of these is fructose and the impact of fructose on the body. Check out
this and
this and
this. It will, like me I suppose, eventually blow you away. It's finally dawned on me, and rocketed me out of the 'puter chair. I went straight to the fridge and dumped (the waste, the waste!) my fructose laden 'healthy' chocolate into the bin. No longer will I be sprinkling fructose on my kid's popcorn, it'll be coconut sugar instead. Print out that fructose food content
table! Someone with health issues needs to keep fructose to under 15g a day. For a reference point a regular sized apple would be about 9g. Forget your five a day if you are cutting fructose. Eat ten portions of veg instead.
But check out this! What a killer!
According to a new research study, refined sugar is far more addictive than cocaine -- one of the most addictive and harmful substances currently known.
An astonishing 94 percent of rats who were allowed to choose mutually-exclusively between sugar water and cocaine, chose sugar. Even rats who were addicted to cocaine quickly switched their preference to sugar, once it was offered as a choice. The rats were also more willing to work for sugar than for cocaine.
The researchers speculate that the sweet receptors (two protein receptors located on the tongue), which evolved in ancestral times when the diet was very low in sugar, have not adapted to modern times’ high-sugar consumption.
Therefore, the abnormally high stimulation of these receptors by our sugar-rich diets generates excessive reward signals in the brain, which have the potential to override normal self-control mechanisms, and thus lead to addiction.
Additionally, their research found that there’s also a cross-tolerance and a cross-dependence between sugars and addictive drugs. As an example, animals with a long history of sugar consumption actually became tolerant (desensitized) to the analgesic effects of morphine.
ref.So, with that bit of heartwarming goodness cheer leading me on, today is the day for me: I am going cold turkey, like a cocaine addict I am now in withdrawal (starting to feel it too). I'll really keep posted here about how I feel and how I get on, it will make me accountable for it somehow I think. The idea (as you can see from the above links) is that after a 2-3 week interval of fructose/sugar free, the body will have re-set, or re balanced the insulin ups and downs and little bits of sweetness can be gradually reintroduced (of a low-non fructose sort).

Just because I am an addict I like the look of
these bars. Less than 1g of fructose per bar! With fructose looking so bad the tiny bit of sugar in that looks a delightfully refreshing option. I see also that the
ombar now have coconut sugar rather than agave as their sweetener. I'd like to know how they taste.

I think I might
then try Coconut sugar (oh you know, I am looking ahead very positively and anticipating that I might one day want chocolate). I bought this years ago as Palm Sugar, in the supermarket, I think it was in a little green tub Thai Taste or some such brand. It's currently the new agave I think. All the rage on raw food sites, I think due to the increasing studies and voices shouting out about bad 'ole agave. Fructose unbound (like agave) is shunted straight to the liver and metabolised as fat. Glucose, on the other hand has been perpetuated as the big baddie, enters the bloodstream which is why we get that rush and then drop as blood sugars rise and fall. But I suppose at least glucose can be used to feed the body's cells. Fructose has a low GI because of this way that it's metabolised. Fructose causes very high levels of uric acid a potent ager of cells and tissue and is potently pro-inflammatory. Coconut sugar is a 1:1 ratio of sucrose to fructose. Sucrose is a disaccharide, such as pure table sugar and has a GI of 64, agave is 40 and coconut sugar/sap is 35. How can that be? The hypothesis put forward is that the coconut sugar is a bound form of two sugars and as such is broken down differently by the bloodstream and absorbed more slowly due to the unrefined nature (ie, lots of enzymes intact, amino acids and minerals). These appear to buffer the absorption process and thus lower the GI. Coconut sugar is from the flowering plants, not the actual nuts from the tree. It can be bought (state side only) as a rich sap or more commonly here in the UK as a thick golden brown sugar (evaporated sap). It is known in Indonesia as 'gula kelepa' and 'jaggery' in India (in India it is recommended to those with diabetes). I am not jumping on the band wagon yet, since most of the nutritional info seems to come straight from the Philippine companies marketing it. But it seems for sugar addicts like myself an option at least that is lesser fructose and perhaps not so harmful or inflammatory. There appear to be various quality types of coconut/palm sugar out there, some dubiously cheap (maybe mixed with regular sugar?). I think in a couple of weeks I will order
this one. I like the look of it. They sell it at
red23 too.
Oh wow. Here goes. My first evening sugar free. Maybe I can nibble my fingernails down instead.... my dh panicked when I told him and said I should wait until we go away in a couple of weeks. What? Ruin my time away being miserable and grouchy? Nah. He can have me now like that instead. Lucky lucky guy :)